In China The Milk U order May Be Breast Milk

snobbish SG

Originally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:

I think I've traveled enough to the third world (and to rural China as well) to make a judgement on that.
And yes, my point is there is extreme poverty, that's why breast milk won't be used in the way you said it was... not anymore then it is pratical for the poor to suddenly use gold instead of wood to build their sheds.

In fact if you did your homework, the WHO points out quite clearly that there is a SHORTAGE of breast milk among the poor leading to health issues among infants.

http://www.breastmilkproject.org/partners.php

So how the poor can sell a commodity they do not already have enough of at prices many times below the actual market value when they can more lucratively sell other of their resources seems to be a basic logic lost only on you.

I'm afriad your attempts to salvage your positions are only making you look sillier, to which I have to do two things:

[b]MYTH BUSTED

+1!!!

Laughing [/b]

Sorry 2 inform u that travelling from loyang 2 Tuas does not count as having travelled to 3rd world..And going to Chinatown is not the same as China?
Laughing Dun make yrself seem so world-smart when yr replies here are making ppl laugh
*Yawn
Its tiring having a debate with a naive child, so i wun continue.

SingaporeTyrannosaur SG

Ah, name calling and wilful misunderstanding of statements to create misdirection from subject topic is a nice evasion tatic, but I'm afraid it will not work in this case given the bulk of the opposing case that has been built against you. Might I suggest you use more flair.

I understand your desire to disengage yourself from a debate that you are clearly losing.

Unfortunately you choose to do it in a way that demostrates a lack of intelligence on your part. Most normal people (as well as those who are viewing this thread) would understand that when I said I travelled to China I was certainly not talking about Tuas or Chinatown. So I regret to inform you that you are only making yourself look stupid by trying to wilfully misunderstand my statements.

But to make it explict, I have travelled to Beijing, Hainan Island (where I spent a lot of time staying in the rural areas and villages not as a tourist mind you), Guangzhou, as well as Qinghai. I have a quite well developed sense of the poverty that exists in China.

I apperciate your efforts to paint me as a person who has not seen the world... but unfortunately not only is your attempt failing miserably... it is making you look rather immature and childish... ironically the values you are trying to put on me.

Laughing

Moving on, you have not disproved any of my positions, and worse, even strenghtened it.

Better still you are unable to post any evidence to support your orginal statement, which is in the topic of your thread. Namely, you have failed to post anything beyond hearsay that "In China The Milk U order May Be #^!*#& Milk"

That makes your case already suspect.

On the other hand, I have provided plenty of links to explore the possibility of such a thing happening, as well as plenty of supporting evidence on what REALLY goes on in China and what to expect. I have revealed that while food piracy is a common occurance in China and there are dishes made from Human milk, the physical and economic evidence points towards Human milk extracted from poor people being passed off as other animal milks is still firmly in the realm of urban legend.

So I'm afraid not only are your attempts to disregard me failing, they are making you look bad.

Unfortunately it seems the only three options left to you now are:

1) Conceed your case (unlikely)

2) Reply in Ad hominem (but it makes you look childish and immature)

3) Retreat and don't answer (but it makes you look defeated given the overwheming weight of the case built against your position)

I suspect option 1 is unlikely to ever happen given this is the internet (in public debate it might be a different story), and option 2 and 3 are more likely, but both only end up being worse for you then me.

As for me, I will still be watching this topic to entertain you, should you choose to find the fortitude to engage in the gentleman's game of proper debate. But of course, given your recent failures there are still two things to do:

Once again:

MYTH BUSTED

+1

snobbish SG

Originally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:

Ah, name calling and wilful misunderstanding of statements to create misdirection from subject topic is a nice evasion tatic, but I'm afraid it will not work in this case given the bulk of the opposing case that has been built against you. Might I suggest you use more flair.

I understand your desire to disengage yourself from a debate that you are clearly losing.

Unfortunately you choose to do it in a way that demostrates a lack of intelligence on your part. Most normal people (as well as those who are viewing this thread) would understand that when I said I travelled to China I was certainly not talking about Tuas or Chinatown. So I regret to inform you that you are only making yourself look stupid by trying to wilfully misunderstand my statements.

But to make it explict, I have travelled to Beijing, Hainan Island (where I spent a lot of time staying in the rural areas and villages not as a tourist mind you), Guangzhou, as well as Qinghai. I have a quite well developed sense of the poverty that exists in China.

I apperciate your efforts to paint me as a person who has not seen the world... but unfortunately not only is your attempt failing miserably... it is making you look rather immature and childish... ironically the values you are trying to put on me.

Moving on, you have not disproved any of my positions, and worse, even strenghtened it.

Better still you are unable to post any evidence to support your orginal statement, which is in the topic of your thread. Namely, you have failed to post anything beyond hearsay that "In China The Milk U order May Be #^!*#& Milk"

That makes your case already suspect.

On the other hand, I have provided plenty of links to explore the possibility of such a thing happening, as well as plenty of supporting evidence on what REALLY goes on in China and what to expect. I have revealed that while food piracy is a common occurance in China and there are dishes made from Human milk, the physical and economic evidence points towards Human milk extracted from poor people being passed off as other animal milks is still firmly in the realm of urban legend.

So I'm afraid not only are your attempts to disregard me failing, they are making you look bad.

Unfortunately it seems the only three options left to you now are:

1) Conceed your case (unlikely)

2) Reply in Ad hominem (but it makes you look childish and immature)

3) Retreat and don't answer (but it makes you look defeated given the overwheming weight of the case built against your position)

I suspect option 1 is unlikely to ever happen given this is the internet (in public debate it might be a different story), and option 2 and 3 are more likely, but both only end up being worse for you then me.

As for me, I will still be watching this topic to entertain you, should you choose to find the fortitude to engage in the gentleman's game of proper debate. But of course, given your recent failures there are still two things to do:

Once again:

[b]MYTH BUSTED

+1
[/b]

For my last reply:
Oh my..wat a silly goose.My thread title is: the milk u drink MAY BE blah..Did i say it MUST BE, OR DID I EVER INSULT ANYONE HERE! I POSTED A TOPIC WHICH IS FOR DISCUSSION N TATS WAT FORUMS are 4!!!!!! WHY THE FARK U AIMING OTHER PPL'S REMARKS AT me! READ CAREFULLY:MY NICK IS SNOBBISH! BESIDES A FEW CASUAL REMARKS I DID NOT FARKING MAKE ANY REMARK! NBCHEEBYE!
Honestly i did not even bother reading yr lenghthy boring silly posts completely, from a moron why should i Laughing

Guys like you are to us females: sickening and tasteless, the type in real life whom is friendless n outcast..and STOOPID

Nite everyone

SingaporeTyrannosaur SG

Even if you don't bother to read my posts, others will do and I think it's quite clear who has the upper hand here. I mean I'm not trying to haolian but it really takes no effort to keep your position at bay and demolish it.

If you choose not to read, unfortunately the only person you are hurting is yourself. I did not write them simply for them to impact you, but to prove the error and hoax that is your topic and thread. And unfortunately, even if you choose to disregard it, it does not change the fact that in the eyes of the public your topic has been discredited.

So it's not bad for a day's work. Another MYTH busted.

Ah, it seems you have chosen option 2, followed by a promise to do option 3.

Not much can be said to you, except it's obvious that your thread has become a lost cause to you. You have been utterly unable to make a dent on the weight of the evidence that has been put against you and even better, reduced yourself to the role of a raving, infantile person.

I mean, who really suffers and shows himself to be immature and infantile from their postings?

Is not immaturity and infantile behaviour more found in posts like this?

Here's an example:

For my last reply:
Oh my..wat a silly goose.My thread title is: the milk u drink MAY BE blah..Did i say it MUST BE, OR DID I EVER INSULT ANYONE HERE! I POSTED A TOPIC WHICH IS FOR DISCUSSION N TATS WAT FORUMS are 4!!!!!! WHY THE FARK U AIMING OTHER PPL'S REMARKS AT me! READ CAREFULLY:MY NICK IS SNOBBISH! BESIDES A FEW CASUAL REMARKS I DID NOT FARKING MAKE ANY REMARK! NB$%@*#%$!
Honestly i did not even bother reading yr lenghthy boring silly posts completely, from a moron why should i

Guys like you are to us females: sickening and tasteless, the type in real life whom is friendless n outcast..and STOOPID

Nite everyone

Laughing

Hai, don't you realize the harder you attack, the more you are harming your own image? Your opponent's reputations untouched, but yours as any sort of a person to be given serious consideration unfortunately... is in shambles.

Well, we'll just have to wait and see if anything that makes vauge sense comes out of you. I am afriad to inform you that your tatics of showing rage and fustration are simply not working... and worse, helping your opponents!

MYTH BUSTED!

+1

snobbish SG

Originally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:
Even if you don't bother to read my posts, others will do and I think it's quite clear who has the upper hand here. I mean I'm not trying to haolian but it really takes no effort to keep your position at bay and demolish it.

If you choose not to read, unfortunately the only person you are hurting is yourself. I did not write them simply for them to impact you, but to prove the error and hoax that is your topic and thread. And unfortunately, even if you choose to disregard it, it does not change the fact that in the eyes of the public your topic has been discredited.

So it's not bad for a day's work. Another MYTH busted.

Ah, it seems you have chosen option 2, followed by a promise to do option 3.

Not much can be said to you, except it's obvious that your thread has become a lost cause to you. You have been utterly unable to make a dent on the weight of the evidence that has been put against you and even better, reduced yourself to the role of a raving, infantile person.

I mean, who really suffers and shows himself to be immature and infantile from their postings?

Is not immaturity and infantile behaviour more found in posts like this?

Here's an example:

Hai, don't you realize the harder you attack, the more you are harming your own image? Your opponent's reputations untouched, but yours as any sort of a person to be given serious consideration unfortunately... is in shambles.

Well, we'll just have to wait and see if anything that makes vauge sense comes out of you. I am afriad to inform you that your tatics of showing rage and fustration are simply not working... and worse, helping your opponents!

[b]MYTH BUSTED!

+1
[/b]

You still have not answered the bottom line question which puts you to shame by making u a rambling idiot who target the wrong source:
Did i say it MUST BE, OR DID I EVER INSULT ANYONE HERE! I POSTED A TOPIC WHICH IS FOR DISCUSSION N TATS WAT FORUMS are 4!!!!!! WHY THE FARK U AIMING OTHER PPL'S REMARKS AT me! READ CAREFULLY:MY NICK IS SNOBBISH! BESIDES A FEW CASUAL REMARKS I DID NOT FARKING MAKE ANY REMARK!
If u cannot even answer this the rest of your replies are all retarded Laughing

SingaporeTyrannosaur SG

Was it aimed at the wrong source? The orgin of a hoax is where you strike to chop the head off the viper.

In this case, you are most certainly the head. You yes, it ought to be, and will be directed at you as much as possible. In fact if you know what is good you should really remove your first post now that it has been shown almost likely that what you have posted is a hoax.

In any case, I am glad to see your topic has been mostly disregarded by general forum as well... this means that I have been sucessful in doing the most important thing, and that is:

MYTH BUSTED

+1!!!

Your reactions to all these are irrelevant to me, my mission has by and far been acomplished.

Here's a tip, the next time before you post something that can inflame opinion, please do some proper homework first.

People have been hauled off for questioning in here (quite recently as well) for posting things that harmed international relations by inflaming public opinion but that later turned out to be a hoax. There is no doubt your topic will get you into trouble the moment somebody chooses to highlight it... so keep up your charade, if you want to test system.

And it's you they will go after, not those who posted the other heated remarks in reply.

So erm, good luck.

aku1b0d0 SG

With that kinda face, I don't wanna eat neinei milk too Laughing

snobbish SG

mama milk must have mama face mah Very Happy

Rad SG

Actually I think it’s ok eh…if you let the people know what you’re serving. How come we drink animal milk ok but human milk not ok.

OasisBlue SG

Confused

crabx SG

take n cook curry or tomyam lor

« Previous Page