This may be the top ten shocking news of US Navy of 2005!!
US CVN was 'sunk',again.
The 40 years old Sg sub
a Singaporian Swedish-trained, and equipped with a Swedish sub
(altho actually not of Gotland class) penetrated the defense of a
U.S CVN that the bells really rang over there... for the first
time, a submarine stood ready to fire its torpedoes against
a US nuclear aircraft carrier.
fr gary1910,Senior Member,26 July 2005http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=144001&page=1
Any news from any forums.This will not appear in official news
release!
2.Where is the sub.
At Kockums Yard (who builds the Gotland class) another favourite
demo they love to play for possible export customers is to balance
a small coin on top of the engine, without it flipping over from
vibrations.
also posted by signatory : Mon Jul 04,2005 in the above
link.
fr
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=52849&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=16&sid=60e0cc16addfd7464671088937bd5106
Sg sub were also under extensive refurbishment at the same Kockums
Yard.
RSS CHALLENGER is an ex-Royal Swedish Navy, Sjoormen Class
submarine that was acquired in 1995 as part of the RSN's submarine
training package. The submarine is currently undergoing a two year
refurbishment programme to extend its operational life; the
programme will be completed in Feb 98. The submarine is to be used
by RSN crew for training in Sweden.
fr
http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/1997/sep/27sep97_nr3.html
This explain why Sg sub could penetrate CVN protection----
Learn from the best.
3.Old sub,but new engine
Sg upgraded sub is using Two Hedemora Verkstad Diesel-electric
engines,
same as SSK GOTLAND CLASS (TYPE A19) ATTACK SUBMARINE, SWEDEN
started built in 1990'S.
fr
http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/news_and_events/nr/1997/jul/30jul97_nr2/30jul97_fs.html
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/gotland/
4.Diesel-electric sub is killer to CVN and nuke
sub?
Fortunately, these failures and shortcomings are finally and
slowly becoming public knowledge in the United States, for as the
Congressional Budget Office revealed in 2001: Some analysts argue
that the Navy is not very good at locating diesel-electric
submarines, especially in noisy, shallower waters near coastal
areas. Exercises with allied navies that use diesel-electric
submarines confirm that problem. U.S. antisubmarine units
reportedly have had trouble detecting and countering
diesel-electric submarines of South American countries
fr http://www.cuttingedge.org/news_updates/nz1839.htm
fr ''Is the U.S. Navy Overrated (5.1)?'' ,An Updated Knightsbridge
Working Paper
Copyright 2004 By Roger Thompson
Professor of Military Studies, Knightsbridge University.
There were many cases CVN were' sunk'!!
Finally, during RIMPAC 2000 it was reported that H.M.A.S. Waller
had sunk two American nuclear submarines and gotten dangerously
close to the carrier U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln. Even more ominous,
asserted researcher Maryanne Kelton, is that: Even though
the exercises were planned and the US group knew that Waller was in
the designated target area, they were still unable to locate
it.
In 2001, the unusually candid skipper of the nuclear submarine
U.S.S. Montpelier (Commander Ron LaSilva, U.S.N.) recounted that a
Chilean diesel submarine "Shot him twice during successive exercise
runs. As a result, LaSilva learned that bigger and nuclear is not
always better. Commander LaSilva should be commended for his
courage, for as we shall later in this paper, this kind of honesty
is usually not the best policy for U.S.N. officers.