well as far as i know yep, mono-intake is the only way. or at
least as far as i've seen. like obersturmfuhrer says there may not
be any specific directive saying so but just the same i've never
heard of it happening.
Now that I've slept on the topic, I still think it's possible.
Don't quote me on it, though ~lol~
SISPEC training is still split beween BSLC & ASLC, right? If
that's the case, I don't see how it could hinder the continuation
training for, say, a physically-qualified Sardaukar who wanna sign
on with the CDOs when doing his BSLC. Just like the top BSLC
trainees could be siphoned on to OCS, a newly-contracted regular
could be transferred on (rather than do ASLC to complete
infantry/guards specializartion).
Or are things so rigid that they make him redo BMT at Hendon, or
exclude him totally for not progressing via the mono-intake route?
That's far-fetched.
[NB. Not advocating advancing conscripted BSLC trainees on to the
CDOs, even as an incentive.]
ORD'd a long time ago; my understanding was built from the days
when they were all under 7 SIB: 1st GDS/SAFGU, 2nd GDS/8 SIR, 1st
CDO, 10th CDO, School of Commando Training, & later 3rd GDS/7
SIR.
Those changes were about 5 years before my time, at the start of
the '80s or so. It came roughly together with the introduction of
the IPPT system, if I recall.
Browsed through some reference book & spotted the differences
between then & now.
Now :- HQ Infantry takes charge of, for both infantry & Guards,
the training of its recruits (via BMTC), specialists (via SISPEC)
& reservists (via ITC & BCTC). The CDOs, as well as OCS,
are outside of this organizational structure.
Then :- 7 SIB, while one of 3 "active" brigades, was very much the
personification of "kings of combat." It had elite elements like
the CDOs & SAFGU (along with 7 SIR & 8 SIR) & also, as
I remember, took charge of ITD (predecessor of BMTC) training as
well. Its sub-unit, the SCT, led the way in instructor training,
particularly grooming NCO trainers who would mentor for the RDF
conversion. The CDOs, thus, was very much a prominent
"conventional" team player then.
Also, the SAF emphasis of those days that all servicemen must go
through the same BMT - Army, Air Force, Navy; combat, technican,
service; elite, non-elite - was one thing that distinguished us
from other armed forces, believe it or not. That's why I presumed
there could be some flexibility in training-course continuation,
esp. for new regulars (don't make sense if not). With the NSFs,
it's certainly applicable, as said, for the top SISPEC
trainees-to-OCS route.