even pakistani with thier old kind of airforce stuff...can shoot
that damned UAV india has..and the UAV is bought from israel
As what i had said, you do not need a technologically advanced
force to shoot down UAVs. Primitive methods like hunting UAV using
eye sight by riding on a helicopter can be done by any airforce,
thus nothing to be astonish about. UAVs are vulnerable to a certain
extent, however years of UAV operations in countless of battles
proved the worth of UAVs.
singapore's UAV as a matter of fact is bought from israel
too
Our UAV inventory is a secret. Of corse we have models from
Israel, other than that, no one is willing to talk about.
they work on those ...areas which i know and im not going to
say..
I think i know more about UAV than you. Dun ask me why, im not
going to say. I believe a number of us here do.
Those UAV are known to crash..many of times in fact and
each UAV crash costs 1.5 million
That is a generalisation and it is not true. Take that a UAV
searcher MK2 cost about 7.5million, a Global hawk cost also about
7.5million?
these UAV also has a limited range...and life..can only go for
few hundred km
That is depending on what UAV u are talking about. ST plan to
build a MAV-1 which have a range of a regular fighter. The Global
hawk have a range of about 300 Nautical miles.
and UAV since can be shot down by PAF ..which uses those AA guns
and Ak-47..im just assuming that UAV itself..nah ain't very
good
I think AK-47 is impossible. Unless the UAV flies at 200 meter
from the ground, so that you can see it or you ride an helicopter
and burn the UAV from the heli's cabin.
Never saw a RSAF black color UAV before. =)
to me UAV is just a modified version of the remote control plane
which has camera lens.
unless ur talking about global hawk or predator..
Wrong, the MAV-1 is black in colour. I think you have a very
primitive view on UAVs. Too bad, new generation UAV isnt just a
remote control plane which have cameras.
stupid searcher is so outdated liaoz..zz..PAF has so much land
to cover yet oso can shoot down..
It still fits our requirement.
haiz whats the point of doing recon...with a 1.5million
plane..anyway the UAV is gonna be obsolete soon..
I am telling you that it is not 1.5 million dollar.
Far away from SG got good points
-stop possibility of pre-empts
-out of range from fighter jets..without KC-135
It is within range of our F-16s with 600gallon tanks and our
A-4SUs.
Near to SG oso quite good
-strike timing needs just 5 minutes to form a formation
-Near to SG bombers.
-Increased vulnearability
-SG unable to detect build up of forces due to air defense
presense
Wrong, athough u can just need 5 minutes of formation. Once you
are up, we can take u down with the I-hawk. We dun have to use UAV
to detect air defense formation, Sat-intell and Humint will do the
trick.
the only few things i like about SAF is..
KC-135..good oil tanker on the air..but need escorts =/
AWACs...
Apache..not really like lar..but the jungle enviroment i dun think
is good
The apaches were first designed to fight the soviet in temperate
forest of eastern europe. So it speaks of it's capability to fight
in the forest. No point using the apache to fight in Jungle, it
will too thick for tanks to manoveur.
i oso don't think the Fearless PV is that good..
last time got a navy poster..
but i don't like..coz the ship small 
so i replaced it with a HUGE nitmitz aircraft carrier poster
more majestic and chio
What is a PV? You need a frigate as a PV? U know nuts!
