then y call me a "slow learner" if u were not trying to "teach"
something? i did not twist my words. u twisted ur own the moment u
denied that u were trying to "teach" something. go ahead and deny
this again coz it'll only serve to fortify this decadent image of
urself. spare us all with ur hypocritical lies pls.
Originally posted by crufty:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
like i said, i'd couldn't care less for what u feel is a strawman,
stickman or superman argument. u called my remarks prejudiced but
never showed proof of it till now. are u saying now that ayc
doesn't work if u are NOT at the limits of traction? whoever said
in the first place that ayc works in all scenarios to give u better
traction? this argument is definitely within scope by ur
definition.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I never showed proof? More like you didn't understand whatever was
typed. I never said AYC doesn't work if the driver is not at the
limits of traction. Who gave a breakdown of how AYC worked? If
you're so smart, tell us then what happens inside the AYC, in your
own words. Don't give us a cop out about lack of time, since you
obviously have time replying.
Originally posted by crufty:
Until now, you still don't understand what is meant by a
strawman argument? You brought up AYC being a traction aid, I
answered, now you're talking about not
being at the limits of traction, which is beside the point.
You should be awarded Off-Topic champion, I guess that will satisfy
your ego.
so now, are u saying that u will now eat ur own words by saying
that it's "besides the point"? it IS the point of discussion now
isn't it? admit it, are u lost? or are u in denial yet again?
i can spare u some trouble of doing a search on google, which will
probabaly give u a satisfactory answer but again, it opens up my
moral integrity to question, something i hate to stoop to at ur
level.
but instead, i'll be honest to say that i have half an inkling of
how ayc works save for the gist of it is that the device
electronically senses the amount of lateral/longitudinal weight
transfer on each corner of the car, reducing and increasing power
on each wheel to maximize traction on each corner.
[quote]quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ok, so tell me whats wrong if i emphasize on driver's competency
and admit that AYC is a traction enhancement device. like i said,
these 2 are factors which are mutually exclusive. but how does that
make my posts "prejudiced"?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because, until it was explained to you, you were equating the AYC
with the driver's competencyok, point out to me when was
the case. until u came up with the post that my comments were
"prejudiced" i only mentioned that ayc was amazing, that ayc allows
the car to corner better, that ayc helps to correct driver errors.
does that sound like i was equating ayc with driver's
competency?
i can understand if the fault of ur arguments lies in ur mediocre
comprehension of simple english, but its plain obvious to me ur
point of contention in this case lies with the fact that u lack the
moral courage to own up to a few things that u have falsely
interpreted to everyone here.
