Originally posted by tailslide:
the 100k membership allows ur wife, ur kids and ur grandparents to
play golf at that country club. besides that, they get to use the
club's gym, restaurant, sauna......... point is, they won't be
paying 100k just to use the golf course. u cannot equate a the cost
of such membership to mean the cost of owning/running the land
area.
The are willing to pay $100K just to be a member the club, and
on top of that they are paying montly maintaince fee and to use the
facilities. Are you willing to do the same? If not then you should
not ask why there are so many golf courses in Singapore. (btw,
those land are not FOC)
a) the government can support a project like this not just in terms
of funding. by offering rebates in terms of various taxes, it can
also result in a win-win situation for them when foreign investors
capitalize on this opportunity to pitch in.
You only enjoy tax rebate if your business make money. I would
call it a lose=lose situation here. Why would foreign investor want
to invest in a project that doesnt make business sense.
b) u have think out of the box. F1 is not the only race series
capable of drawing big crowds. weekly open track days are also
possible and would be a welcome option for ppl like me who have to
drive 300 kms to SIC in order to have a decent track session. i m
certain neither one of us would have the number crunching
competency to churn out a projected revenue in this case, else we
wouldn't be discussing this on an open forum.
Yeah I know there are other race series, but how big a crowd are
you talking about, and how much $ can you draw from these crowd?
$500 per ticket to watch?
For a 15 year leasehold recreation land in singapore, it should be
at least $200 per sqm and this will cost you $180m for the land and
$200m for the contruction. Base on financing cost of 5% per year,
your yearly interest payment to the bank will be $19m for a $350m
loan. Assuming your contract with FIA is only 6 years, you must be
able to recover all the investment within the first 3 years and
start to make profit in the last 2 years.
I will leave the rest of the calculation to your own
imagination.
c) this is a scenario is as likely to happen as it is not to. did
the builders of SIC, bahrain, spain... circuits ever think of this
possible eventuality before they decided to build their tracks?
land constraints aside, but why did they go ahead and dump millions
into building the tracks anyway? IMO, it takes calculated risks to
make reasonable gains. if we are always behaving and thinking like
scared chicken sh!ts, we'll never take that first step to achieving
anything.
Before you take any risk, you must first ask why you want to
take such a risk. If I can host a F1 race with just $50m investment
on a street circuit, then why do I want to take UNNECESSARY risk to
invest in the $380 million project that generate almost the same
returns. Calculated risk? I think this is suicider.
[/quote]