"HE very clearly SAID i implied so and
so. he did not imply. He said this is what u're trying to imply
blah blah blah. THAT is putting words into my mouth because i never
implied anything of the sort. His miscomprehension lead to his
misidentification of a non-existant implication."
What he said:
"In dat case u are implying gals
in their 20s overseas mus be angels "
What you replied quoting his post:
"dear dear, the topic matter at hand is "1988 batch of sg guys are
bad" ok? im telling her, not just 88 batch and not just sg guys.
We're not discussing how good or bad girls in sg or overseas are. U
wanna go OFF TOPIC, go start yr own rant thread please.
I said nothing of the sort, dun put
words into my mouth hor, u wanna mark yrself out as an idiot
also is it?"
Haiz.. He had said that you had "implied", he didn't say you had
"said" so why did you replied you "SAID" nothing of the sort? If
you had posted, " I IMPLIED nothing of the sort" I wouldn't have
made any comments. That is what I was trying to tell.
What I said in my first post to the threadstarter:
"Hey Jane, read what I'm posting and think about it. What you have
just posted is totally stereotyping SG guys. Just because a few of
them disses you, you have no absolute right to condemn other
innocent SG guys. You are no different from a terrorist. It goes to
show your maturity level. Because of you, can I say that all SG
girls your age, are senseless, immature, whiny b*tches. That would
be unfair right? So think twice before posting. Don't let your
emotions and anger get the better hold of you. Think with an open
mind girl, don't disgrace SG girls..."
"against chelzea, there is a debate and
an exposure of flaws in his reasoning and arguments with counter
reason. I don't think i ever attempted a "copy post analogy" for
him. And no Im not trying to tell him that its bad to do whatever
he did the same way u told the threadstarter."
Point out to me the "copy post analogy" in my post towards the
threadstarter. The intended effect of me saying this "Because of
you, can I say that all SG girls your age, are senseless, immature,
whiny b*tches. That would be unfair right?" is to let her see that
what she had posted at first has the same unfairness effect. That
was the analogy I used and it is not a "copy post analogy"
"On the contary, I was pointing out to
him that he CAN say
whatever he wants, but when gals who have a thing against
men AND gals who have nothing against men ALL start to tell him
he'll be doing men a big favour by letting it go, its really time
for him to zip up and stop damaging the fragile egos of
men."
Similarly, my post to the threadstarter does not restrict her from
posting at all. She can post whatever she wants, but provided it's
of a better material then her first post.
"once again, u screwed up. how did him
saying that i was implying something AND u saying that he said i
was implying something, to becoming u saying that he was implying
something? no, no no. There is no miscomprehension on my part. but
for u to totally not understand what u're saying anymore, and then
TURN AROUND and say i don't comprehend u, is so ironic and absurd
that its hilarious. Please, go READ your own previous post again
and see if u've actually just committed the cardinal sin in
debating, of misunderstanding YOURSELF. 
"
What I had said:
"I was just pointing out that he had implied and not putting
words into your mouth. I didn't care about what he had implied or what you had
actually said. Try comprehending my posts first before asking me to
comprehend yours. So far your "debate" against chelzea I had not
said anything about the content so what is there to comprehend
about?"
My apologies, I think I mistype the sentences. My mistake. (Gee
what an embarrasment 
)
But that wasn't what I had intended to say for my previous posts.
See above.
"so don't u come telling me i disrespect
u because u've already done the same thing 1st without even
realising it."
When did I disrespect you first? Maybe like you said I didn't
realise it so quote me the first post I showed disrespect towards
you first. So far I believed, I have not shown any disrespect to
anyone unless the person is not worth of the deserving respect. If
you think that by continuing my "debate" with you is a form of
disrespect, then that is in your personal view and I
apologized.
My initial "debate" with you was simple. You had replied to my
first post saying it was useless or something like that. And so I
disagreed and started the "debate" with you. Now, the "debate" is
heading nowhere. Maybe like you said my level of comprehension is
not good enough so I'll guess I'll just have to rest my case here.
I admit, my English sucks to the max! C6 for O level and C5 for GP
But
I still stand by my views. Maybe I did not express it well(that has
always been the problem). Oh well, [email protected] no hard feelings yah?
