well, it would be evidence of no foreign talents robbing locals
of jobs, wouldn't it? Wouldn't that be beneficial to your
arguments?
You are asking for "Date of dismissal, Company's name,
(Singaporean's Surname and initial, Age, Salary, Years of working
experience, sex), if possible Foreign Talent's information such as
Surname and initial, Age, Salary, Years of working experience, sex"
as evidence of FTs robbing jobs as evidence
But how about us asking you, would you give us your Date of
employment, Company's name, (Singaporean's Surname and initial,
Age, Salary, Years of working experience, sex) to give us evidence
that FTs are indeed not robbing locals of jobs?
My point is, this form of "collecting evidence" by asking private
information here, and making conclusions when others do not want to
give out private information, is wrong.
However, even if FTs managed to rob locals of jobs because of
skill, my question to everyone who are against FT policy is, why is
it wrong? So we are to say that Singapore companies should not
employ FTs?
Imagine this, if a foreign company full of FTs (FT in the eyes of
Singaporeans) replaced a whole company (only sgreans) in Singapore
in the global business arena, wouldn't more locals too be 'robbed'
of their jobs? For example the company Creative. Do you think it
fared better than Apple? Do you think that if Creative employs
mainly Singaporeans, would it have done better? And without doing
better, they might have to retrench or close down, and thus, locals
would be 'robbed' of jobs by the company Apple, in which the
workers are in our eyes, FTs? Either way, it just mean that your
jobs will be 'robbed' by foreigners if you don't have the necessary
skills.
Just for information, Singapore public service itself has about
120k employees. Also, if you have walked many shopping centres in
Singapore, many in the service industry are also Singaporeans. In
addition, the many school children (above age 15) who worked part
time to finance their own pocket money would also be considered
employed.