A sexless marriage

parn SG

Hi Parn,

I think you might have pushed it abit this time. The chap had sex 2 times a month... i seriously cannot understand how that comes across as having a high sex drive.

I think if a guy can continue to love a woman through marriage with having sex 2 times a month that is something (clap clap). In fact I'll be surprised if divorce papers weren't filed.

Honestly it's between the 2 of them. In this case I assume the wife has also admitted it is a problem (scared of being pregnant or whatever).

Sex to a guy is more of a physical need and he does not really need emotions to be involved as compared to a girl whereby emotions help out. It's similar to eating.

I think if he is already doing his handjobs to help relieve the problem it is a good start.

If girls believe that marriage is all about love and sex is like a reward i.e. fish for the dolphon in the zoo when he does something right...oink oink.

Then how about marriage being just all about love and guys find sex with whores. We get sex and love. Girls get love and no sex. Whores get $. Win win win.

Sounds Good?

Hi Sexless,

However, I do feel that threatening your wife is not an option...she has a problem and she can't help but feel pain so threatening her infact does not help anything or further improve the situation. Getting professional help does.

Kind Regards

Genie

Genie, how come you can so easily believed that TS only had sex 2 times a month and you don't believe what I have wrote?

Is it because TS didn't tell you how often he had to ask for sex and how he reacted in a not so (clap clap) manner towards his wife whenever he got rejected and felt frustrated towards his wife?

Is it because TS failed to write it out in black and white how disappointed and angry he was during those times when he had failed to obtain sex from his wife?

You want to tell me again about the love which he had continued to love his wife?

Do you really need TS to write out all the ugly things that he had "forgotten" to include in details about himself before you feel NOW is the right time to tell him off?

If TS had written out all his ugly thoughts, I would say he is ready to learn to be a better man and deserves to be forgiven for what he have done.

I will do your (clap clap) for TS if he had told us that he haven't tried to had sex with the wife because his wife was uncomfortable about it. How do you want me to do the clapping when he did threatened his wife into submission?

Honestly, it's between the two of them and he should not have posted in here if he or you cannot stand to hear this kind of replies from me.

You are a guy and that's why you supported him and I believed you would've done the same things as him and yet feels so right about doing so. You guys are really all the same isn't it?

It's true that love begins from the lower part of the body for guys and love begins from the upper part of the body for girls.

Really, if you feel like giving TS your support because you are able to side with him like he is your son, I also hope you can also side with TS's wife like she is your own daughter.

Would you have agreed with your son-in-law and tell him that you're sorry because you believed the problem lies in your own daughter?

Do you believe you need me to tell you this so that you will then start looking clearer at the many things that were not written in this situation?

Fcukpap SG

the question of sex is a part of the marriage which sluts will never see that perspective...because they will never understand the physiological construct for the male...if we need to tell sluts...then they r real sluts who have never been women....they remain as sluts

Fcukpap SG

if sluts remain preserved as sexless...they r telling the modern or commercial world they are but a can of expired preserved oysters or see ham on the shelf pleading only to be sold...

parn SG

Yeah...sex is part of marriage.

I can see many men married to whores and prostitutes already!

And I don't want to know your theory behind real sluts and pirated sluts (Do you mean Ah Kuahs?).

parn SG

if sluts remain preserved as sexless...they r telling the modern or commercial world they are but a can of expired preserved oysters or see ham on the shelf pleading only to be sold...

sexless sluts = sluts

sexful sluts = sluts

Make up your mind before you confuse yourself further.

TTFU SG

Yeah...sex is part of marriage.

I can see many men married to whores and prostitutes already!

And I don't want to know your theory behind real sluts and pirated sluts (Do you mean Ah Kuahs?).

Actually apart from his trolling, what he said is true. Sex is a part of marriage. Like i said before, You can lust on someone without being in love. You cannot be in love with a person if you do not lust on her/him.Except Platonic Love. Lust (or lechery) is a craving for sexual intercourse, sometimes to the point of assuming a self-indulgent or violent character. Lust, or a desire for the flesh of another"

parn SG

Sex is part of marriage -> when come to this kind of topic that will greatly affect the self-interest and benefits of guys, I will see many guys becoming self-righteous all of the sudden.

So what do you all think about sex before marriage? Is that right also? Would you also allow your daughter to be fucked by her many bfs before she get married? Would you also agreed if your future gf/wife also got fucked by many other guys before she marries you?

So what do you think of guys visiting whores and prostitutes? Is that right also? Would you allowed your daughters to marry guys who have frequent whores and prostitutes before?

Bottomline, guys who behaved casually about sex before they were married, simply do not have the RIGHTS to come here and act self-righteous about it.

Please take a good look at your own life and how you have lived your life first, before you come here and tell me you DESERVED to be treated fairly about your moral demands regarding sex in marriage.

And don't mix up sex with love. You can still love one another even though both of you are no longer capable of having sex with each other. You will still continue to love one another even though both of you no longer desired for each other's bodies.

So nowadays guys are more likely to dump their wives when they are no longer desirable to provide sex for them in a marriage?

This is really a concern to worry indeed!

TTFU SG

Sex is part of marriage -> when come to this kind of topic that will greatly affect the self-interest and benefits of guys, I will see many guys becoming self-righteous all of the sudden.

So what do you think of guys visiting whores and prostitutes? Is that right also? Would you allowed your daughters to marry guys who have frequent whores and prostitutes before?

Bottomline, guys who behaved casually about sex before they were married, simply do not have the RIGHTS to come here and act self-righteous about it.

Please take a good look at your own life and how you have lived your life first, before you come here and tell me you DESERVED to be treated fairly about your moral demands regarding sex in marriage.

So nowadays guys are more likely to dump their wives when they are no longer desirable to provide sex for them in a marriage?

This is really a concern to worry indeed!

You fail to realise that women actually have needs. But because men having a penis and having a different body structure, we crave for sex more. And yes blame us.

And as for your questions, its up to your beliefs and morals on how you treat sex seriously or casually . Each of those questions have may have different answers also. And as how i lead my life, who are you to question me ? Have i questioned yours ?

I didnt mix them up. Last post : You can lust on someone without being in love. You cannot be in love with a person if you do not lust on her/him

mancha SG

TS and wife both want to have sex.

troublemaker2005 SG

I think sex is just part of marriage. If you are in so much agony about a sexless marriage then you probably should get a wfie or woman with higher sex drive. You can balance that with treats just like dogs. words, money, surprises, fetishes all can contribute to adding spice to marriage in terms of the sex part.

the reason why this page is in top searches is because lots of people post here that's why. hoho

parn SG

You fail to realise that women actually have needs. But because men having a penis and having a different body structure, we crave for sex more. And yes blame us.

I didnt mix them up. Last post : You can lust on someone without being in love. You cannot be in love with a person if you do not lust on her/him

Ohh...I cannot discuss morals with people who have no morals.

And I cannot discuss righteousness with people whose righteousness are meant only to benefit themselves and bend to feed their own lust and i-cannot-lose ego.

Good luck with your lust, as there are many couples out there who aren't really compatible with one another based on their physical appearances.

I supposed if loving a person really requires lust to be one of the factor, then can I say there are people out there who likes to fuck ugly.

Please continue to spread your fuck ugly theory then.

TTFU SG

Ohh...I cannot discuss morals with people who have no morals.

And I cannot discuss righteousness with people whose righteousness are meant only to benefit themselves and bend to feed their own lust and i-cannot-lose ego.

Good luck with your lust, as there are many couples out there who aren't really compatible with one another based on their physical appearances.

I supposed if loving a person really requires lust to be one of the factor, then can I say there are people out there who likes to fuck ugly.

Please continue to spread your fuck ugly theory then.

Yes, how can i discuss with something that dont even know what are morals in the first place ?

Sorry, but i cannot see righteousness comming into the picture.

I dono what you meant by compatible with one another based on their physical appearances

Oh wow, did i see wrong ? you blame someone having no morals yet you classify people according to their physical appearance, So is ru hua preety or lin chi lin ?

Naa its not a theory, i have no problems of you trying to protect women with your flames, but i do mind when you try to classify all men with lust as immoral and ''dirty''

small-man SG

parn<== You sound like someone who haven't been love and have sex for years? whats wrong why so negative?

parn SG

Yes, how can i discuss with something that dont even know what are morals in the first place ?

Sorry, but i cannot see righteousness comming into the picture.

I dono what you meant by compatible with one another based on their physical appearances

Oh wow, did i see wrong ? you blame someone having no morals yet you classify people according to their physical appearance, So is ru hua preety or lin chi lin ?

Naa its not a theory, i have no problems of you trying to protect women with your flames, but i do mind when you try to classify all men with lust as immoral and ''dirty''

It is clear for everyone to see that you are already unable to participate and argue rationally at my posts.

Don't know who is the lustful animal who tried to mix lust with love into marriage to repackage lust into a morally acceptable traits, but I'm sure that immoral trash is just trying to save all men by confusing the readers into believing that lust isn't immoral and "dirty".

The true fact is, the more desperately that men tried to deny lust as an immoral attitude towards women, the more convincing it became a clear fact that men will become selfish in their immoral thoughts and become angry at women when the privileges of their cocks are being compromised.

No wonder true love or love ran away from them, because their true love or love begins from their lower part of the body.

Let's see how much lower these men are willing go.

small-man SG

<yawnz>

jojobeach SG

TTFU, It is sickening to know that TS's wife has to EXCHANGE sex for love.

FYI: There are many women with higher sex drive than their men. Unfortunately, you'll never know.. because they won't be telling YOU.

Here we have TS threatening his wife because he's not getting enough sex.

But do you see women threatening their partner when they don't get orgasm all the time ? No.

Trust me, there's PLENTY of men who are unable to satisfy their own partner. Men who couldn't hold out long enough.. men who cannot erect properly.. men who doesn't know how to move properly to give her orgasm. Men who do stupid things during intercourse that are anti climatic.. and MANY MORE !!

It's so obvious you are just trying desperately to justify the bad behaviors selfish men commits with "physical construct " wat a load of rubbish !!!

TTFU SG

TTFU, It is sickening to know that TS's wife has to EXCHANGE sex for love.

FYI: There are many women with higher sex drive than their men. Unfortunately, you'll never know.. because they won't be telling YOU.

Here we have TS threatening his wife because he's not getting enough sex.

But do you see women threatening their partner when they don't get orgasm all the time ? No.

It's so obvious you are just trying desperately to justify the bad behaviors selfish men commits with "physical construct " wat a load of rubbish !!!

I'am not trying to justify TS. I dint say anything about TS anymore btw. What i was saying that its wrong to classify all men with lust as immoral and ''dirty'' . Women can have lust to men too, but is it considered immoral and dirty ?

But If you are talking about the TS, If that guy is a sex manic and overly demanding of his wife to satisfy him, his wrong to put the blame on his wife.

TTFU SG

It is clear for everyone to see that you are already unable to participate and argue rationally at my posts.

No wonder true love or love ran away from them, because their true love or love begins from their lower part of the body.

Let's see how much lower these men are willing go.

I see, once again using this to gain an advantage. Seems like you see lust as a trait of a sex manic. But you fail to realise that all humans have lust in them, male or female. But how high level is this lust differentiate people.

Oh yeah, flame on.

Darkseed73 SG

To Parn and JoJo,

Please don’t judge TS unless you know him personally.

Also Parn, calling woman whom enjoy sex = sluts is so wrong.

What’s wrong with woman enjoying sex?

In this time and age, people’s mind is still so narrow mind. Is this the majority Singaporean speaking? If a HUSBAND wants to have sex with WIFE is immoral, I think you people should be sent to middle-east and start wearing veils and u really know what is being a WIFE about.

Finally, I assume jojo and parn are girls whom seems like on their way to become man-hater.

jojobeach SG

To Parn and JoJo,

Please don’t judge TS unless you know him personally.

Also Parn, calling woman whom enjoy sex = sluts is so wrong.

What’s wrong with woman enjoying sex?

Finally, I assume jojo and parn are girls whom seems like on their way to become man-hater.

We are not man haters. We just hate LAME men. Big difference dude.

FYI : Middles eastern men are a bunch of wimps. They would torture their women so that they feel like they are a man.

Without the full covers, their wifes are gonna run away.. Without the woman's clits cut off.. their wives are gonna have sex with other men. How pathetic are they ?

IMO, they are the worst of the insecure lots. Using religion to justify their atrocities towards their wife, dotters and siblings. With due respect, I don't believe Allah created women to be mistreated by men.

So, if our men has some back bones.. they'd stop comparing us to those abused women in middle east.

Are we suppose to be so GRATEFUL that our Asian men are not as LAME as those middle easterners ? Geesh... lame !

FYI, this is an annonymous forum. No one is required to post their personal details here..OK then.. why don't he post his face here.. and I shall not judge.. haha !

« Previous Page Next Page »