Can I say I'm really disappointed with the route amendments?
I was literally shocked when I saw the posters... Like
seriously, what's this? So many route amendments that make no
sense...
And why are there still so many services at Boon Lay? I hope
256, 258 will loop at Boon Lay instead of terminating there... If
not, it's a total failure of planning.
99: Good.
258: The section between Boon Lay and Pioneer is very good...
Will be a major hit in Jurong West. It may even become the next 860
especially during AM peak, as the walking distance from Pioneer MRT
to the bus stop is much shorter than from Boon Lay MRT to Boon Lay
Int, and there's higher probability of getting seats at Pioneer MRT
as compared to Boon Lay.
However, the section between Pioneer and Joo Koon is weird...
Other than having a terminating point (if 258 loops at Boon Lay)
and connecting Jurong West town with Joo Koon, I don't find it
useful in any other ways. And is there such a strong demand between
Jurong West and Joo Koon that warrants connection to the doorstep?
From my experience, most commuters on JIS (except 246) are foreign
workers. How many of them stay in areas where 258 plies?
And why the hell is 258 a JIS when its main demand comes from
Jurong West town? (If not, why is it using this service number?)
There may even be 258M from Boon Lay looping at Pioneer MRT...
Because it's loading will be much higher than the Pioneer - Joo
Koon sector.
182/M: Expected.
192 and 193: Again, this doesn't make sense at all... Is it fun
to just give 192 a heavily duplicated route from Boon Lay to Joo
Koon, and just let 193 take over 192's deleted sectors? I can't
think of any reason for 192's amendment - except for a faster
journey from Tuas to Pioneer/Boon Lay, which doesn't sound really
necessary to me, especially when 192 already calls at the bus stop
outside Joo Koon ITH and more than half of the pax already alight
there; and faster journey from Upp Jurong Road to Boon Lay, which
is again unnecessary. Especially considering 193 is the service
with weaker loading and lower capacity than 192, and now 193 has to
take all the pax from Lok Yang, Soon Lee Dormitory (there are
foreign workers going to Boon Lay, and soon there will be many
going to Joo Koon to transfer to 253/254/255/257), and Jurong West
Ave 4... How can 193 handle a route with such high loading, when
192 just slacks between Joo Koon and Boon Lay?
257: Expected.
256: Although it's a good service in mantaining 256's link in
Jurong West and unique sector along Jln Ahmad Ibrahim, it shows no
uniqueness at all... As if it's simply breaking up 257 into 256 and
257. Not sure if people will be happy... Furthermore, judging by
the route, 256 may have poor frequency. Which is worrying because
it will be the only service from Soon Lee Dormitory to Joo Koon Int
(with 193 only calling at the bus stop along Benoi Rd), and also
from Soon Lee to Pioneer/Boon Lay. To be honest, I think the route
amendments did not consider those workers at all, or to a very
limited extent.
254: Expected.
255: Expected.
253 and 251: I want to discuss these 2 services together...
Because 251's amendment again doesn't make sense. 253's Benoi
Sector part and 251's Boon Lay Way part I can understand... But
251's big loop at Shipyard/Pioneer for what? It appears to me that
this kind of amendment is just for profits without considering
convenience of commuters. Shipyard Rd now has a bidirectional
service, and after the amendment, only unidirectional 251? Same for
Pioneer Rd (although they have 253). And Benoi Rd left with 253
which winds along Benoi Sector... Again, I cannot figure out
why.
194: Is this a joke? A bird park service being used just to
cover the deleted sectors of 251? And expecting all those visitors
from Bird Park returning to Boon Lay to cross the road... Moreover
Jurong Bird Prk will be moved soon... Then what's the function of
194? Just to serve the few bus stops along Jln Ahmad Ibrahim?
258 may be a trunk or JIS Service under BSEP