i obsess serv 47. take note of my trip last week.
thu am 720am 3417k
tnm mrt (14)
bdk sth avenue 3 (17)
bdk sth rd (22, 25, 31, 33)
bdk sth avenue 1 (33, 32)
mp rd (35, 36, 34, 32, 28, 25, 33, 30, 18, 8)
amber rd (12)
east coast rd (10, 12, 14)
still rd sth (14)
mp rd (15, 21, 22, 28, 35, 40, 44)
bdk sth avenue 1 (54, 56)
bdk sth rd (58, 60, 63, 64)
bdk sth avenue 3 (69)
tnm mrt - i count 32 peop get down. when i alight next stop, i
count total peop on bus are 71 peop. so 37 peop use 47 bef tnm to
business park.
then i take serv 12 single decker pack to door. i only person to
ask bus stop else wud not stop. i think had 64 peop but bus so
crowd i could have +- 4 peop count error
high loading point = 69 bef tnm and 71 aft tnm.
It just shows that 47 does deserve its DDs and not that bad as
some "users" here claimed.
Hence, it is important that for new services, we should at least
give 2-3 months if not more, before commenting.
I comment on sv 119/102 because even after +3 months of introduction,
the loading has not reached a DD worthy loading. 119 is gone case
with 3 years, yet loading remains <50 pax.
85 loading remains in 50-60 pax peak but I am still okay as it
is more of long distance route.
